Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Med Clin (Engl Ed) ; 159(5): 214-223, 2022 Sep 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35935808

RESUMO

Introduction: Smoking can play a key role in SARS-CoV-2 infection and in the course of the disease. Previous studies have conflicting or inconclusive results on the prevalence of smoking and the severity of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Methods: Observational, multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 14,260 patients admitted for COVID-19 in Spanish hospitals between February and September 2020. Their clinical characteristics were recorded and the patients were classified into a smoking group (active or former smokers) or a non-smoking group (never smokers). The patients were followed up to one month after discharge. Differences between groups were analysed. A multivariate logistic regression and Kapplan Meier curves analysed the relationship between smoking and in-hospital mortality. Results: The median age was 68.6 (55.8-79.1) years, with 57.7% of males. Smoking patients were older (69.9 (59.6-78.0 years)), more frequently male (80.3%) and with higher Charlson index (4 (2-6)) than non-smoking patients. Smoking patients presented a worse evolution, with a higher rate of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (10.4 vs. 8.1%), higher in-hospital mortality (22.5 vs. 16.4%) and readmission at one month (5.8 vs. 4.0%) than in non-smoking patients. After multivariate analysis, smoking remained associated with these events. Conclusions: Active or past smoking is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19. It is associated with higher ICU admissions and in-hospital mortality.


Introducción: El tabaquismo puede tener un papel importante en la infección por SARS-CoV-2 y en el curso de la enfermedad. Los estudios previos muestran resultados contradictorios o no concluyentes sobre la prevalencia de fumar y la severidad en la enfermedad por coronavirus (COVID-19). Material y métodos: Estudio de cohortes observacional, multicéntrico y retrospectivo de 14.260 pacientes que ingresaron por COVID-19 en hospitales españoles desde febrero a septiembre de 2020. Se registraron sus características clínicas y se clasificaron en el grupo con tabaquismo si tabaquismo activo o previo o en el grupo sin tabaquismo si nunca habían fumado. Se realizó un seguimiento hasta un mes después del alta. Se analizaron las diferencias entre grupos. La relación entre tabaquismo y mortalidad intrahospitalaria se valoró mediante una regresión logística multivariante y curvas de Kapplan Meier. Resultados: La mediana de edad fue 68,6 (55,8­79,1) años, con un 57,7% de varones. El grupo con tabaquismo presentó mayor edad (69,9 (59,6­78,0 años)), predominio masculino (80,3%) y mayor índice de Charlson (4 (2−6)). La evolución fue peor en estos pacientes, con una mayor tasa de ingreso en UCI (10,4 vs 8,1%), mayor mortalidad intrahospitalaria (22,5 vs 16,4%) y reingreso al mes (5,8 vs 4,0%) que el grupo sin tabaquismo. Tras el análisis multivariante, el tabaquismo permanecía asociado a estos eventos. Conclusiones: El tabaquismo de forma activa o pasada es un factor predictor independiente de mal pronóstico en los pacientes con COVID-19, estando asociada a mayor probabilidad de ingreso en UCI y a mayor mortalidad intrahospitalaria.

2.
Intern Emerg Med ; 17(4): 1115-1127, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35235131

RESUMO

Uncontrolled inflammation following COVID-19 infection is an important characteristic of the most seriously ill patients. The present study aims to describe the clusters of inflammation in COVID-19 and to analyze their prognostic role. This is a retrospective observational study including 15,691 patients with a high degree of inflammation. They were included in the Spanish SEMI-COVID-19 registry from March 1, 2020 to May 1, 2021. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified 7 clusters. C1 is characterized by lymphopenia, C2 by elevated ferritin, and C3 by elevated LDH. C4 is characterized by lymphopenia plus elevated CRP and LDH and frequently also ferritin. C5 is defined by elevated CRP, and C6 by elevated ferritin and D-dimer, and frequently also elevated CRP and LDH. Finally, C7 is characterized by an elevated D-dimer. The clusters with the highest in-hospital mortality were C4, C6, and C7 (17.4% vs. 18% vs. 15.6% vs. 36.8% vs. 17.5% vs. 39.3% vs. 26.4%). Inflammation clusters were found as independent factors for in-hospital mortality. In detail and, having cluster C1 as reference, the model revealed a worse prognosis for all other clusters: C2 (OR = 1.30, p = 0.001), C3 (OR = 1.14, p = 0.178), C4 (OR = 2.28, p < 0.001), C5 (OR = 1.07, p = 0.479), C6 (OR = 2.29, p < 0.001), and C7 (OR = 1.28, p = 0.001). We identified 7 groups based on the presence of lymphopenia, elevated CRP, LDH, ferritin, and D-dimer at the time of hospital admission for COVID-19. Clusters C4 (lymphopenia + LDH + CRP), C6 (ferritin + D-dimer), and C7 (D-dimer) had the worst prognosis in terms of in-hospital mortality.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Linfopenia , Biomarcadores , COVID-19/complicações , Ferritinas , Humanos , Inflamação , Prognóstico , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 159(5): 214-223, 2022 09 09.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34895891

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Smoking can play a key role in SARS-CoV-2 infection and in the course of the disease. Previous studies have conflicting or inconclusive results on the prevalence of smoking and the severity of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). METHODS: Observational, multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 14,260 patients admitted for COVID-19 in Spanish hospitals between February and September 2020. Their clinical characteristics were recorded and the patients were classified into a smoking group (active or former smokers) or a non-smoking group (never smokers). The patients were followed up to one month after discharge. Differences between groups were analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression and Kapplan Meier curves analyzed the relationship between smoking and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The median age was 68.6 (55.8-79.1) years, with 57.7% of males. Smoking patients were older (69.9 [59.6-78.0 years]), more frequently male (80.3%) and with higher Charlson index (4 [2-6]) than non-smoking patients. Smoking patients presented a worse evolution, with a higher rate of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (10.4 vs 8.1%), higher in-hospital mortality (22.5 vs. 16.4%) and readmission at one month (5.8 vs. 4.0%) than in non-smoking patients. After multivariate analysis, smoking remained associated with these events. CONCLUSIONS: Active or past smoking is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19. It is associated with higher ICU admissions and in-hospital mortality.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Clín. investig. arterioscler. (Ed. impr.) ; 32(3): 94-100, mayo-jun. 2020. tab, graf, ilus
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-193353

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of an inter-arm blood pressure difference greater than 10mmHg in patients with type 2 diabetes, and the association of this measurement with the presence of a low ankle-brachial index and mortality at 5-year follow-up. METHOD: A validated blood pressure measurement protocol was used. The blood pressure was calculated for each arm to obtain mean systolic differences. Peripheral arterial disease was confirmed by an ankle-arm index less than 0.9. The medical history of the patient was reviewed in the computerized clinical notes after 5 years of follow-up. RESULTS: The study included 139 patients with a mean age of 70.1 years (49% male), and a mean duration of diabetes mellitus of 10.8 years. A total of 50 (36%) patients had an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference greater than 10mmHg. Patients with an inter-arm systolic blood pressure greater than 10 mmHg had lower ankle-arm index (0.91 ± 0.30 vs. 1.04 ± 0.28, P = 0.005), and higher mortality rates from all causes (48.0% vs. 28.9%; hazard ratio 1.64; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-2.53; P = 0.03), compared with those with lower inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes have an elevated systolic blood pressure difference between arms. A significant relationship was found between elevated inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference, lower ankle-brachial index and greater all-cause mortality


OBJETIVOS: Estimar la prevalencia de una diferencia de presión arterial entre brazos superior a 10mmHg en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2, y su asociación con el índice tobillo-brazo y la mortalidad a los 5 años de seguimiento. MÉTODO: Se utilizó un protocolo validado de medición de presión arterial. La presión sanguínea se calculó para cada brazo para obtener diferencias sistólicas medias. La enfermedad arterial periférica fue confirmada por un índice tobillo-brazo inferior a 0,9. El estado vital del paciente se revisó en la historia clínica electrónica a los 5 años de seguimiento. RESULTADOS: Estudiamos a 139 pacientes con una edad media de 70,1 años (49% hombres) y una duración media de diabetes mellitus de 10,8 años. Un total de 50 (36%) pacientes tenía una diferencia de presión arterial sistólica entre brazos mayor de 10 mmHg. Los pacientes con diferencia elevada de presión arterial sistólica entre los brazos mostraron un menor índice tobillo-brazo (0,91 ± 0,30 vs. 1,04 ± 0,28; P = 0,005), y una mayor tasa de mortalidad por todas las causas (48,0% vs. 28,9%; cociente de riesgo 1,64; intervalo de confianza al 95%: 1,06-2,53; P = 0,03), respecto a los pacientes con menores diferencias de presión sistólica entre brazos. CONCLUSIÓN: Encontramos una alta proporción de pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 que tenían una diferencia elevada de presión arterial sistólica entre los brazos. Existe una asociación significativa entre la diferencia elevada de la presión arterial sistólica entre brazos, el índice tobillo-brazo y mortalidad


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Braço/irrigação sanguínea , Índice Tornozelo-Braço/métodos , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidade , Protocolos Clínicos , Pressão Arterial/fisiologia , Intervalos de Confiança , Análise de Variância
5.
Clin Investig Arterioscler ; 32(3): 94-100, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32044138

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of an inter-arm blood pressure difference greater than 10mmHg in patients with type 2 diabetes, and the association of this measurement with the presence of a low ankle-brachial index and mortality at 5-year follow-up. METHOD: A validated blood pressure measurement protocol was used. The blood pressure was calculated for each arm to obtain mean systolic differences. Peripheral arterial disease was confirmed by an ankle-arm index less than 0.9. The medical history of the patient was reviewed in the computerized clinical notes after 5 years of follow-up. RESULTS: The study included 139 patients with a mean age of 70.1 years (49% male), and a mean duration of diabetes mellitus of 10.8 years. A total of 50 (36%) patients had an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference greater than 10mmHg. Patients with an inter-arm systolic blood pressure greater than 10mmHg had lower ankle-arm index (0.91±0.30 vs. 1.04±0.28, P=0.005), and higher mortality rates from all causes (48.0% vs. 28.9%; hazard ratio 1.64; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-2.53; P=0.03), compared with those with lower inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes have an elevated systolic blood pressure difference between arms. A significant relationship was found between elevated inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference, lower ankle-brachial index and greater all-cause mortality.


Assuntos
Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Índice Tornozelo-Braço/métodos , Braço , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
8.
Retina ; 33(3): 508-12, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23099497

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of concomitant systemic therapy in patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated by intravitreal bevacizumab and to propose a mechanism for different interindividual response. METHODS: Retrospective, nonrandomized, single-center, consecutive interventional case series study. Forty-six eyes from 46 patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration were treated by monthly intravitreal 1.25 mg bevacizumab injections on a pro re nata regime. Patients' files were revised and changes in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study best-corrected visual acuity, central foveal thickness as determined by spectral domain optical coherence tomography, number of injections performed, occurrence of severe adverse effects, and systemic concomitant medication were recorded. The effect of systemic medication on final best-corrected visual acuity, central foveal thickness, and number of injections performed was evaluated. RESULTS: The most frequent systemic medications recorded were angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors in 19 patients, beta-adrenergic blocking agents (n = 18), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (n = 17), diuretics (n = 16), calcium channel blockers (n = 14), benzodiazepines (n = 11), proton-pump inhibitors (n = 9), and statins (n = 8). Thirty-two patients had arterial hypertension. Average follow-up was 25.1 months (standard deviation [SD] = 8.9). Average gain in best-corrected visual acuity was 0.9 (SD = 13.6) and -2.1 letters (SD = 15.9) at 12 months and 24 months, respectively. The average reduction in central foveal thickness was 111 µm (SD = 54) and 105 µm (SD = 71) at 12 months and 24 months, respectively. The average number of intravitreal injections required was 6.7 (SD = 3.2). Patients on treatment with systemic beta-adrenergic blocking agents required less intravitreal injections (5.2, SD = 2.4 vs. 7.9, SD = 3.4) and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0068, multiple linear regression). CONCLUSION: Concomitant systemic beta-adrenergic blocking agents treatment may reduce the need for repeated intravitreal injections of bevacizumab in patients with choroidal neovascularization associated with age-related macular degeneration.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Bevacizumab , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Diuréticos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Injeções Intravítreas , Masculino , Retratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa/diagnóstico , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...